As I identify more segments to family lines, the pattern of inheritance appears so random. It certainly appears that some siblings are more genetically related than others. What we inherit from our parents is sometime a small amount of DNA from one ancestor, or the entire DNA on some segments.It is a lottery.
We have 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 16 great great grandparents, 32 great great great grandparents, 64 great great great great grandparents, 128 5th great grandparents and so on. While knowing your tree out to those 5th and 6th great grandparents definitely seems imperative in identifying DNA, so does having a full tree, in other words, you need to identify each generations siblings and do their DNA. Even then, a lot of the time, if you have a match that has a tree, you will look at it and be like, I don't see a connection.
Why? Well, human error I think it partly responsible for sure. I had to change names to the "wrong" names in my tree so that PAL would show up in her circle at ancestry DNA. Not every tree out there is right. From non parental events, to just plain bad research (or those lovely hints on ancestry. Why would you attach a record to a tree that is obviously wrong.)
So back to my trends. Let's look at the total cM's and how widely they vary among my testers. Using myself, each parent and a few of their largest matches (only one uses data from 23andme). Relationships in the table are the relationship to my parent.
Mom
|
Me
|
Her nephew
|
Her ½ cousin
|
1st cousin 1R
|
2nd cousin 1 R
|
|
Mom
|
NA
|
3549 cM
|
1929.5 cM
|
590.6 cM
|
580.4 cM
|
152 cM
|
Me
|
3549 cM
|
NA
|
1039.7 cM
|
214.1 cM
|
233.5 cM
|
126 cM
|
Her nephew
|
1929.5 cM
|
1039.7 cM
|
NA
|
230.3 cM
|
415.4 cM
|
81 cM
|
Her ½ cousin
|
590.6 cM
|
214.1 cM
|
230.3cM
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
1st 1R
|
580.4 cM
|
233.5 cM
|
415.4 cM
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
2nd 1 R
|
152cM
|
126 cM
|
81 cM
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
From this table you can see that though my cousin and I are
the same generation, we inherited differently. I share more with Mom’s 2nd
cousin once removed from the maternal line (our 3rd cousin) and he
shares almost as much as mom with her 1st cousin once removed (our 1st
cousin twice removed).
Similarly, her half first cousin shares 83 cM with a 2nd
cousin once removed and mom shares only 19 cM with the same person, though they
are identically related, and her nephew shares 16 cM with the same person in a
segment not shared with either. (Data not in table).
Dad
|
ME
|
½ 1st 1 r
|
2nd 1R
|
Dbl 2nd 1R
|
4th cousin
|
|
Dad
|
NA
|
3552 cM
|
209.6 cM
|
106.8 cM
|
370 cM
|
81 cM
|
Me
|
3552 cM
|
NA
|
61 cM
|
63.2 cM
|
220.3 cM
|
0
|
½ 1st 1 R
|
209.6 cM
|
61 cM
|
NA
|
47.7 cM
|
NA
|
NA
|
2nd 1 R
|
106.8 cM
|
63.2 cM
|
47.7 cM
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
Dbl 2nd 1R
|
370 cM
|
220.3 cM
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
4th cousin
|
81 cM
|
0
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
Dad and his ½ 1st cousin once removed are the
same relationship to his 2nd cousin once removed, yet he shares
twice the DNA. He shares a large amount with his 4th cousin, yet I
share none with the same person, and I only have about ¼ the DNA in common with
his ½ 1st cousin once removed but ½ with his second cousin once
removed and about 2/3 of the DNA with the double 2nd cousin once
removed.
What does this mean, it’s possible that we inherit less of
one ancestor’s DNA than others. Until we can map an entire genome for one
person we can’t be certain, but it certainly looks like DNA isn’t share and
share alike. What we get is a mix match of DNA that often includes greater
portion from one ancestor than another.
It's always interesting to see how differ we connect to other family members. I've had two 1C1R tested and they are 2C to each other, one paternal aunt and 5 1c so far, all of us are related. But now that distant matches are coming up (only two I've connected so far) it's amazing how they match some of us vs. 0 for the others. That would include how I match up to distant (5C) matches but even my own aunt does not come up as a match.
ReplyDeleteMore interesting is dealing with my endogamous side and how I had a now confirmed 4C get DNA tested and she came back showing totally random segments to our common cousin. I was told that it was expected. But when you're dealing with unknown connections, how would you be able to map them out? It's just misleading and yet interesting at the same time.
So very true! I share 894.88 cM with one first cousin, and only 599.85 with another first cousin. Each is a daughter of two different sisters of my mother (no question). I also seem to have much closer DNA matches with one family line on my paternal side than others; perhaps because my great-grandmother's parents were first cousins?
ReplyDelete