Tuesday, October 31, 2017

DNA statistics- Paternal

DNA is not passed down exactly 50/50 from each grandparent pair. However, I still wanted to see just how much DNA I had identified using those parameters. I am not sure I got all the highest matches especially because I had to look at three different sites, but here goes my first try.



Note: I share 50 percent of my DNA with my parents and my daughter. On Gedmatch that number varies in cM from 3549 for Mom, 3552 for Dad and 3581 for my daughter using my 23andme test. Dad and mom are both on 23andme and my daughter is on Ancestry. For an average I am using 3560 cM as marker for 50%.  Differences are likely due to unreadable (no call) areas from the samples.

Based on the unrealistic 50 % DNA from each parent in each generation, this is what the contributed DNA “should” be for my parents, me and my daughter if every generation was inherited equally at 25 % for each grandparent’s DNA contribution.

Relationship to my Mom/Dad
Percentage
Dad/Mom’s estimated
cM
My estimated cM
My daughters estimated cM
Grandparent
25 %
1780 cM
890 cM
445 cM
Great Grandparent
12.5%
890 cM
445 cM
222.5 cM
G.G. grandparent
6.25%
445 cM
222.5 cM
111.3 cM
G.G.G. grandparent
3.125%
222.5 cM
111.3 cM
55.6 cM
GGGG grandparent
1.563 %
111.3 cM
55.6 cM
27.81 cM
GGGGG grandparent
0.781 %
55.6 cM
27.81 cM
13.9 cM

My parents are only on 23andme and Gedmatch, where I am on Ancestry, 23andme and Gedmatch and my daughter is on Ancestry and Gedmatch only. (I am not using FTDNA or my heritage matches for this table.)  Since most “in common” identified matches will go back to a common ancestor pair (or double the DNA from the above table as “possible”) I wanted to look at the highest match to a known DNA pair for my parents, myself and my daughter. The results for my father’s side is below.

Surname of pair
Relationship to Dad
Dad cM estimated
Dad highest match
Me cM estimated
Me highest match
My daughter cM estimated
My daughter highest match

Barnes/Franklin
Grandparents
3560
370[i]
2C1R
1780
735
1C1R
890
486
1C2R
Hardy/Pyburn
Grandparents
3560
NA
1780
NA
890
NA
Barnes/Baker
G
Grandparents
1780
266
2C
890
175
2c1R
445
109
3C1R
Franklin/Thomas
G
grandparents
1780
69.5
890
173
2C1R
445
84.6
Hardy/Johnson
G
grandparents
1780
146
2C1R
890
153
2C1R
445
NA
Pyburn/Mccurdy
G
grandparents
1780
NA
890
NA
445
NA
Barnes/Owens
GG grandparents
890
34.6
445
69
4C
225.5
22.6
Franklin/Merrill
GG grandparents
890
NA
445
178[ii]
3C1R
225.5
NA
Baker/Vaughan
GG grandparents
890
NA
445
36
3c1r
225.5
NA
Thomas/
Brunson
GG grandparents
890
72.6
445
65
3C1R
225.5
20.9
Hardy/ Nelson
GG grandparents
890
106.8
2C1R
445
63.2
2C2R

225.5
55.5
Johnson/
Diamond?
GG Grandparents
890
NA
445
NA
225.5
NA
Pyburn/Chitty
GG Grandparent
890
64
445
55
225.5
22.3
McCurdy/Beck
GG grandparents
890
168.9[iii]
445
116
225.5
91.8
Barnes/Sanders
GGG grandparents
445
NA
225.5
66
3C1R
111.3
NA
Owens/Long
GGG grandparents
445
NA
225.5
NA
111.3
NA
Franklin/
Brunson
GGG grandparent
445
69
225.5
60.4
111.3
44
Brunson/Platt
GGG grandparents
445
80.5
225.5
64.8
111.3
44.5
Thomas/
unknown
GGG grandparents

445
NA
225.5
NA
111.3
NA
Merrill/Merrill
GGG grandparents
445
62
225.5
38
111.3
na
Baker/
Copeland
GGG grandparents
445
49.4
225.5
16
111.3
16
Vaughan/Jones
GGG grandparents
445
NA
225.5
NA
111.3
NA
Hardy/ King?
GGG grandparents
445
33.5
225.5
31
3C2R
111.3
NA
Nelson/Hudgens
GGG grandparents
445
NA
225.5
NA
111.3
NA
Johnson/ Parker
GGG grandparents
445
80.3
225.5
21
111.3
NA
Unknown
GGG grandparents
445
NA
225.5
NA
111.3
NA
Pyburn/ Stapleton
GGG grandparents
445
NA
225.5
NA
111.3
NA
Chitty/Brown?
GGG grandparents
445
45.8
225.5
39
111.3
31.6
McCurdy/
Sunday
GGG grandparents
445
33.9
225.5
27.2
111.3
26.2
Beck/ Woodcock?
GGG grandparent
445
81.9
225.5
11.4
111.3
NA




[i] Double 2nd cousin once removed. Dad’s first cousins aren’t on Gedmatch
[ii] He is related twice through Brunson/Platt and Merrill/Franklin (relationship closer)
[iii] Omitted the half cousins from William McCurdy and second wife in this line because they are double McCurdy’s it can alter percentages.

No comments:

Post a Comment