A more accurate YDNA haplogroup from 23andme tests

While trying to find information about my family's Y DNA haplogroup, I ran across a post on a message board stating that the SNP testing at 23andme was accurate but that they used the 2010 tree. Hmm, I remembered reading a great blog about extra stuff you could do, and I went back to it. I thought I would blog about it so that other 23andme user's would know how to get the latest  haplogroup based on the 2015 tree. To be honest, I do not know if there are snp's not tested by 23andme that determine haplogroups.

1. Download your raw data from 23andme.
This is found under the Browse raw data option on the upper right hand drop down menu. Once the data is downloaded, you need to extract the zipped file.

2. Download the 23andme to y snp program.
This wonderful little program is found here.

3. Open the 23andme to y snp program and then open your raw data file from within the program. It will analyze the data. Save this new information to a txt file from within the program. I usually save it in the same file as the raw data that is unzipped so I can find it again.

4. Download the chrome extension, ISOGG Y tree add on, a link to it is found here.

5. Open the ysnp file you just saved. Select edit, select all and copy.

6. On Chrome, go to the three lines in upper right corner, and click on it. Select settings in the drop down menu. Then select extensions.Find the ISOGG Y tree add on in the list. Under it there will be a link for options. When you select this you will get a new window. A sample is already in slot 1. You can add up to 9 more people's y snp data. Put the name of the person and paste the ysnp file data you copied from the text file. Close the window.

7. Go to the ISOGG Y tree. You can find it here. You will see letters representing the first letter of the haplogroup. There are also links for the Y tree from previous years. The add on will work with all of them.
Click the letter that corresponds with the haplogroup you were assigned by 23andme.

8. Once you get to the haplogroup page, the add on will load. In the upper left hand corner when it is done you will find a drop down screen. Select the name you want to run the program on. When it stops saying loading, scroll down the page. The SNP's will be highlighted RED or Green. Green means you have the SNP, Red means you don't. Simply put, the last green highlighted snp on the page is the one that corresponds to the haplogroup to it's left, and that's the haplogroup your dna is at this time.

As a result of this, my mom's paternal line went from R1b1b2a1a1d at 23andme to R1b1a2a1a1c2 in the 2015 table.

Hope this helps.

Discovering a lineage, with help from the X chromosome

As I have mentioned before, Mom's half first cousin recently tested. While I was waiting for his results from 23andme to show matches, I uploaded his raw data to Gedmatch. A few days later I was surprised to see his third highest match, 138 cM autosomal and 54.1 cM on the X chromosome with an estimated difference in generations on gedmatch of 3.4.

I emailed the match and requested a tree. Before receiving it though he had already confirmed he was of Hungarian lineage, which I also knew was the nationality of both of SH's grandparents. Unfortunately though, all SH knew was his grandfather was John Pado and his grandmother was Agnes Odor. From ancestry.com I knew what year Agnes arrived, and that on her death certificate her father's name was listed as John Odor.
Her immigration arrival gave also where she was from in Hungary, Gyovar.

I already knew that any connection we found in the tree's would have to come not only from SH's maternal side, but from either a connection to the mother of  John Pado, the mother of Agnes Odor, or the mother of John Pado, because an X chromosome match ruled out anyone who was not an X donator. I also verified that the name Janos was the Hungarian equivalent for John. Since I was unable to find, and still cannot find, the immigration record for certain of John (Janos) Joseph Pado, I looked at what I did know, the village of Gyovar.

When I received the tree of SH's match, I looked it over. Bingo, he had  in his tree the Kaposi family who intermarried with the Horvath family in his tree as his Great Grandparents and they were from Gyovar. Since the Great Grandparents were the right generation for the estimated match, I then went to ancestry.com and searched for Pados in Hungarian Baptism Records. I found Janos Pados whose wife was Rozalia Kaposi in several in the village of Gyovar.

My next step was to see if Anna Kaposi and Rozalia Kaposi were sisters, and indeed I found that Vendelin Kaposi and Julianna Holtain had baptism records for Anna Kaposi and Rozalia Kaposi in Gyovar, and that they were of the right age to match the baptisms of each girls children. Thus SH's great grandmother Rozalia Kaposi was the sister of his match's great grandmother, making them 3rd cousins, and giving SH and his sister a little bit more of their immigrant ancestor's history.

Ancient DNA and me

Over on Gedmatch you can compare your autosomal DNA raw data with ancient DNA. More about the types of ancient DNA and some other nifty tools you can use can be found here.

So I tested all five of my profiles at gedmatch. Not one snp matched, even on the lowest setting on comparison directly. You get a graph on the other function there, but all it looks like to me is a whole bunch of orange lines. So I decided to use the ancient calculator that Feliz Immanuel wrote and test our DNA that way.

Here are the results. I arranged them sort of higher to lower matching. The number is the percent of DNA that matches.

Ancient DNA	ME	JM	SH	DAD	MOM
Ne 1	20.09	21.46	21.04	20.16	21.34
usht ishm	16.64	17.04	17.09	16.99	17.93
loschbour	16.92	16.32	17.36	17.5	15.34
linearbandkeramik	20.35	20.04	20.07	21.16	19.69
clovis	12.59	13.52	11.3	12	14.03
br2	22.65	21.62	20.94	21.73	23.29
kostenki14	5.7	5.35	4.83	5.12	5.34
motala 12	6.12	5.66	5.26	6.16	5.31
australian aboriginal	1.01	1.1	2.24	0.85	1.29
br1	1.44	1.8	2.05	1.75	2.25
co1	2.6	2.42	3.17	3.31	3.07
hinxton4	1.03	1.23	1.6	1.28	1.11
IR 1	3.34	2.98	2.79	4.4	3.37
KO1	3.24	3.27	4	3.44	3.18
LaBranaarintero	3.9	3.26	4.75	3.57	3.41
Malta	2.47	2.03	2.16	2.23	1.89
NE 5	1.89	2.05	2.6	2.38	2.13
NE 6	2.48	2.32	2.99	3.48	2.67
NE 7	2.38	2.64	2.71	2.39	2.54
Paleoeskimo	2.58	1.85	1.62	2.85	2.22
gokhem2	0.57	0.43	0.76	1.46	0.88
hinxton 1	0.12	0.09	0.3	0.28	0.12
hinxton 2	0.19	0.31	0.27	0.22	0.71
hinxton 3	0.36	0.24	0.24	0.34	0.64
hinxton 5	0.19	0.14	0.48	0.28	0.47
vi33.16 neanderthal	0	0.12	0.1	0	0.04
vi33.25 neanderthal	0.05	0	0.11	0	0.05
vi33.26 neanderthal	0	0.04	0.19	0	0.15

I would love to know if there are any averages for the above tests, and also if the above samples test higher with one than another in comparison. 

Disappointment with Ancestry Admixture or Composition Results

Since many members of my groups on facebook research possible Native American ancestry, it is not unusual for me to see posts about how disappointed they are that there is not any, or very minuscule, amounts of Native American showing up on their admixture or composition results.

To be honest, there are times I honestly think that they got the results they were supposed to, however, there is a very good reason that someone does not have the results they think they should. It is called recombination and it is how our genes are passed down.

To illustrate this fact, I am going to use examples from my mom, her cousin SH and her nephew JM with genealogically proven third cousins once removed. Genetically speaking a third cousin has the estimated DNA of 0.781 percent or 53 cM,  a third cousin once removed has  the estimated amount of DNA around 0.391 percent or 26.56 cM shared, and a fourth cousin (for JM) should share about 0.195 percent or 13.28 cM of DNA.

Mom has matches with two sisters and one daughter on her Hager side. The sisters are 3rd cousins  to my mother and SH and the daughter is a 3rd cousin once removed. (for JM that means third cousin once removed and fourth cousin).There is another Hager descendant also of the same degree they match as well.

Mom matches one sister at 145 cM, the other at 130 cM, both third cousins, the daughter at 65 cM and the last at 9.9 cM both third cousins once removed.
SH matches one sister at 40 cM, the other at 74 cM, the daughter at 39 cM and the last at 5.2 cM
JM matches the one sister at 29 cM, the other at 0 cM, both third cousins once removed, andthe daughter at 22 cM and the last at 7.7 cM, both fourth cousins.

Another example is a genealogically documented third cousin once removed on the Collins family.
Mom matches him at 38 cM, SH at 134 cM and JM not at all.

So let's say, hypothetically speaking, that the native DNA was represented by one of these ancestral common ancestors DNA. As you can tell by the numbers, the amount passed on varies significantly, even though the genealogical distance is the same for SH and my Mom. In the case of JM, when he has no shared DNA it means he didn't receive any of that genetic material. If this portion of the DNA represented the person who was passing on the Native DNA it would mean yep, he's not going to show a percentage even close to that of his biological Aunt.

It's obvious that there is some kind of sticky DNA going on in some of my mom's family, she is sharing 1.7-1.9 percent of DNA with her Hager cousins, but only 0.5 percent with her Collins one, and on the flip side, her first cousin is sharing .0.5-0.9 percent with his Hager cousins and 1.8 percent with his Collins cousin.In both cases, the lower percentage is more the average, so the larger matches while possible, are not typical.

Ancestry composition is passed the same way as this DNA, it is a recombination draw of the lottery in what gets passed on to each generation. So how is it my Mom actually shows a percentage of Native DNA close to her actual degree of blood based on genealogy and the Dawes? Luck for the most part, when you stop and think that her last full blood ancestors on the Trahern only side were born in the 1770's, with mixed bloods intermarrying until her great great grandfather married a full blood. Even at that, Mom's great grandmother could only be 11/16 Native American (her father was 3/8 and her mother full).

Based on the Dawes where she claimed only 1/2, mom's Choctaw DNA should be 1/16 or 6.25 percent, if you include the reported actual, it would be11/128 or 8.6 percent . Her 23 and me results show her at 8 percent, and gedmatch admixtures average 8-10 percent based on the program.

Even though her great grandfather and her grandfather are by family history Native American, their contribution would be so minuscule that it's not even worth computing.

So if your disappointed with your admixture results, you really need to look at some of your close family and test them. First cousins, and even siblings do not always share an equal amount of DNA from all their contributors.

Blood is thicker than water, part 2

So, if testing my mother's half cousin, and her paternal relatives will assist me in finding her matches and answering questions on her tree, is there any benefit to testing on my father's?

Yes. Already 11 McCurdy cousins have tested. As you will see below, this has allowed me to determine 61.5 percent of my father's McCurdy DNA. So who would be beneficial to test?

 For everyone, we are in great hopes that a great granddaughter of Elijah McCurdy will test. If so, that may help us identify other McCurdy matches outside our own family other than the one we have found.

Dad's grandmother had a half brother whose daughter is still living. Not only is this a half first cousin once removed, her grandmother was my father's grandfather's cousin, meaning she's doubly related to Dad, and on the two least represented branches of his maternal tree, the Pyburn and the Hardy family.

We have several Hardy cousins to possibly test if they agree. They are anywhere from 3-4th cousins, and hopefully we can find a willing male who carries the Y DNA haplogroup.

The Brunson  and Franklin side has been seriously lacking in confirmed matches, despite the large percentage of mutually shared DNA Dad has that's mentioned below. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone close enough on those branches to even approach about testing.

Below is a summary of the results of research with Dad's DNA at this point and time.

Paternal DNA 3718 cM of which a total of 478.4 cM or 12.9 percent has been identified.

Combined match with two sets of most recent common ancestor (MRCA)

John L Barnes and Eleanor Baker and Jacob Barnett and Amanda Thomas 359 cM or 9.7 percent of the DNA from both sets of families as below, in addition to below matches.

50 percent or 1859 cM consisting of Barnes, Baker, Owens, and Copeland families

MRCA John Sanders Barnes and Sarah Owens 34.6 cM or 0.9 percent

MRCA Willoughby Baker and Rachel Copeland 69.2 cM or 1.9 percent

50 percent or 1859 cM consisting of Brunson, Franklin, Thomas, and Merrill families

MRCA Jacob Merrill/Holland Merrill 62 cM or 1.7 percent

MRCA Isaac Brunson and Margaret Oldys 6.4 or 0.1 percent

Brunson unconfirmed MRCA 10.4 cM or 0.28 percent

Maternal DNA 3718 cM of which a total 321.1 cM or 8.6 percent has been identified.

50 percent or 1859 cM consisting of McCurdy, Sunday, Beck, Pyburn and Chitty families

MRCA James Chitty and Mary Brown 35.9 cM or 0.97 percent

MRCA Elijah McCurdy and Barbara Sunday 109.3 cM or 2.9 percent

MRCA William M McCurdy and Amanda Beck 67.2 cM or 1.8 percent

MRCA William M. McCurdy or Elijah McCurdy/Barbara Sunday 33.7 cM or 0.9 percent

MRCA John Sunday or Elijah McCurdy 13 cM or 0.3 percent

MRCA McCurdy immigrant 10.4 cM or 0.27 percent

MRCA John Sunday 11.9 cM or 0.32 percent

MRCA Barbara Sunday (x chromosome) 39.7 cM or 1.1 percent (representing 21.8 percent of X chromosome DNA)

Note, possible some of Elijah McCurdy and Barbara Sunday matches may be matching the Beck family and not the McCurdy (100.3 cM match with this person, some confirmed with other matches).

In this branch, ¼ (464  cM) each should be McCurdy, Beck, Chitty and Pyburn. Note, only Chitty DNA has been identified other than McCurdy. A total of 285.2 cM (61.5 percent) has been identified as McCurdy/Sunday branch, not including the X chromosome matches.

50 percent or 1859 cM consisting of Hardy, Nelson, and Johnson families

no matches confirmed

Blood is thicker than water

To further my use of DNA and assist in my genealogy I recently tested my mother's half first cousin, SH and her nephew JM. Both are lineal Y DNA descendants of the earliest known ancestor Steely Hager. The 23andme haplogroup is from the 2010 tree, but using the 23andme to ysnp program and then the ISOGG tree add on, I was able to confirm that both have R1b1a2a1a1c2b haplogroup on the 2015 tree, enumerated by FTDNA as R-L48/S162 in the U106 subclade.

Unfortunately, I have not found one Hager from North Carolina lineage who is in a YDNA project to see if they even have the same haplogroup. Because 23andme tests with snp's, the haplogroup is accurate, though useless to compare with the Y STR tested for the YDNA surname projects, I was hoping to find someone with the same haplogroup to look into the genealogy to confirm a connection. Hopefully one will pop up some time in the future.

That said, the advantage of testing my mother's half first cousin is they only have a mutual grandfather in common. That means the 572 cM they share in common represents for each of them 15.4 percent of the approximate 25 percent of DNA each would have inherited (61.6 percent). This has been greatly beneficial for identifying matches as either Paternal or Maternal along those segments, and not only that, but further delineating them to only one grandparent's branch is definitely easier to trace a genealogical tree.

I am hoping to further identify segments by testing my mother's second cousin, at least one of her father's first cousins, and similar relatives on my father's side. By testing a first cousin once removed or a second cousin that narrows the matches to just one pair of ancestors. By selecting individuals who share 3-6.25 percent DNA in common on average, you are potentially discovering 6-12.5 percent of one parents DNA contribution. (Keep in mind, the tables that give the average shared DNA give percentages for your entire DNA, but when testing a relative on one side, the result is actually double that in context of that particular parents match.).

So how successful have I been in the first 6 months of research on my mother's DNA matches? I decided to take a look, and here is what I found.

Paternal DNA (roughly 3719 cM total) 23.1 percent identified

50 percent or approximately 1859 cM of which a total of 5.7 percent has been identified beyond a mutual grandfather. 572 cM (15.4 percent) identified for all of this branch in common with a mutual grandfather.

Hager to include Barnett, Bagwell, Whitley, Adams, Collins, Mangum

Most recent common ancestor (MRCA) William “Dan” Hager/Eda Martha Burnett 174 cM or 4.7 percent

MRCA Daniel Collins/Talitha Adams 1 percent or 38.3 cM

Connection to Barnett (identification of MRCA not made yet) 1.9 percent or 71 cM

25 percent or approximately 929 cM total identified 272 cM or 7.3 percent

Adams to include Rogers. No identifiable Adams matches because of his unknown parentage. Additional matches to the wives whose surnames are not verified are included, though the exact connection has not been determined yet.

MRCA Henry/Mahala Rogers 170.7 cM or 4.6 percent

MRCA Dauswell/unknown wife 27.9 cMor 0.75 percent

MRCA Susannah rumored Shue (X chromosome match) 27.2 cM or 0.73 percent

Identified as a match to Rogers (27.1 cM) included above and probable Adams (47 cM) from an adoptee. Since his exact connection is the unknown portion  represents an additional 1.2 percent

 25 percent or approximately 929 cM Trahern, Riddle, Hall and Choctaw lineage.

Only three matches with no verifiable connections at this point totaling 24 cM or 0.6 percent with known Choctaw descent and no other possible common ancestors.

Maternal DNA

Approximately 3718 cM in total of which 310 cM or 8.3 percent has been identified.

50 percent or approximately 1859 cM Hinds and their early colonial ancestors and the Paxtons of unknown lineage

MRCA Francis M. Hinds/Emma Paxton 46 cM or 1.2 percent

MRCA John Corliss/ Mary Wilford 66 cM or 1.8 percent

50 percent or approximately 1859 cM Timmins, Brampton, Spicer and other English, non American lineages.

MRCA George Henry Timmins and Sarah Brampton 198 cM or 5.3 percent

Mayhew Mission, Choctaw nation female students

The following is transcribed from images obtained by Jeff Fortney.

Account of Beneficiaries who have been members of the female school at Mayhew

Name	Age	Ped	Time entered	Mos of Res	Notes
Anna Maria Tappan	10	Full	May 1822	38	Could read, write and sew handsomely, is married
Mary Reed	11	Do	Dec 1822	13	Read in testament, is home
Isabelle Porter	7	Do	May 1822	33	Is home, could read well in testament
Susannah P. Brashears	11	Do	Jan 3, 1823	15	Could read, is married
Priscilla Townsley	9	Do	Apr 4, 1823	11	Read only in spelling ?
Anna Homer	16	Do	Nov 6, 1824	29	Can read Choctaw & English write attended some to Geo? Perform various kinds of labor set a good example for the school is very uniform in her behavior and is much devoted to the ? Of the redemer.
Vina Folsom	13		Feb 14, 1823	19	Read in testament, is married to Isaac Watson
Eliza Nelson	9		Do , 1823	35-1	At Mayhew is married to N. Cochnear, left April 22 to reside with her friends Can read Eng & Choctaw write attended some to Geo H. behaves with propriety and is considerably devoted
Sophia Nelson	8		Do, 1823	35-1	At Mayhew ? she cause of her redeemer, left at same time, reads well in English and Choctaw, amiable and much beloved, lives with her grandmother
Elcy James	11	½	Mar 18, 1823	10	Is married and lost what she had learned
Visa Kincade	8	½	1823	11	With her grandmother, could read in Tes. is desirous to return but is opposed by her friends
Abigail Folsom	8	½	Apr 4, 1823 left March 3, 1829	36-14	At Mayhew. Left to reside with her mother, attends school now at Yoknickchy lives with Mr. Byington, reads and writes well in English & Choctaw
? Folsom	5		Apr 12, 1823	28	Was a promising student, died in August 1826
? Beams	8		Apr 26, 1823	32	At home reads well
			2nd entry May 1, 1828		Left March 3, 1829, started in Geography
Susan Anderson	5	½	Sept 5, 1823	11	At home read only in spelling
Susannah Nail	8		Oct 6, 1823	25	One of the most promising scholars, died in Oct 1827 death caused by her clothes taking fire
Margaret Hall	22		Nov 21, 1823	6	With her relations, has been employed one year to take care of smaller girls at school has conducted with propriety
Lucinda Riddle	17		Nov 21, 1823	11	Very promising, was married Died March 1827
Judith Walker	13		Nov 21, 1823	12	With her father, read and wrote, good scholar, amiable
Hannah F. Bradshaw	14	Full	Jan 3, 1824	15	Promising girl, read in tes. Is married
Tennessee Folsom	17		Feb 19, 1824	4	Read and wrote decently, made mens clothes, is married
Emily Folsom	13		Feb 19, 1824	27	Could read and write attended some to Geo. Cut and made men's clothes. Neat and industrious. Behaved with propriety. Is married
Priscilla Townsley	6	Full	Apr 1, 1824	11	With her mother, read only in spelling lessons
Nella Folsom	3		Apr 12, 1824	18.9	With her mother, read in words of 3 syllables
			2nd Apr 22, 1828		Left March 3, 1829 and is with her friends, could read in testament
Ishlahoya ?	4		Apr 15, 1824	10	At home
? rah F. Richardson	8	Full	May 3, 1824	23	At home
Lovisa Nail	16		Mar 16, 1824	4	Married to Israel Folsom
Mary Nail	15		Mar 16, 1824	12	Married
Alzira Nail	14		Mar 16, 1824	10	Read in tes. Has lived with her mother
Artimitia Wade	5		Oct 26, 1824	16	At home commenced easy reading ?
			2nd March 20, 1829	9	Could read the testament in English and Choctaw
Alahoka	6	Full	Nov 3, 1824	8	At home
Anna Homer	16	Full	Nov 6, 1824	24	At home, married to Sam Folsom
Betsy James	13		Nov 6, 1824	8	At home
Mary Jones	20		Nov 15, 1824	5	Married
Gincy Hall	5		Nov 15, 1824 2nd Jan 13, 1830	5 14	At home could read English and Choctaw and compose and write letters
Selina McDonald	3		Dec 24, 1824 2nd Jan 13, 1830	14 6	Commenced easy reading. Left on . at home
Rhoda Pitchlynn	13		May 19, 1825	4	Read in testament and is with her father Married 1829
Mary Pitchlynn	14		May 19, 1825	4	Read tolerably well and wrote. Is with her father, married 1829
Charlotte Wall			May 1, 1825 2nd Oct 1, 1828	10 16	At home
Elzira Folsom	5		Oct 7, 1826	16 28	At Mayhew Left school to go over Mississippi could read and write and had some knowledge of geography
Eliza Colbert	5		Oct 7, 1826	16 27	At Mayhew Left to go over river Fall of 1831, could read well in both languages, write letters and had studied geography
Patsy Folsom	6		Oct 7, 1826	17	At home, read in Test.
Vina Magee	5		Oct 7, 1826	18 36	At Mayhew was a member of school until about January 8th 1832
Kezia Wade	15		Oct 7, 1826	8	At home
Orilla Folsom	8		Oct 7, 1826	17	At home read in English and Chatha
Miriam Hancock	7		Oct 7, 1826	35	At Mayhew
Anna Magee	7		Oct 7, 1826	18 18	Mayhew dismissed from school
Eliza Hohuma	12	Full	Oct 31, 1826	3	At home
Alzira Pickens	7		Oct 7, 1826 2nd Oct 1829	9 6	Commenced easy reading at home, died in 1831 on way to the new Choctaw Country
Gincy Folsom	4		Oct 10, 1826	9	Mayhew
Amy Folsom	4		Oct 13, 1826	9 27	Mayhew Left to go to the new country
Visa Hancock	6		Oct 14, 1826	9	Mayhew
Sina Nail	6		Oct 2, 1826	9	Mayhew Was a member of school until it closed
Susanna Liles	15		Oct 27, 1827		With Mr. Macumber at home
Rachel McGilbra	10		Oct 17, 1827		Dismissed from school
Hotima Christeen Baker	12		Oct 17, 1827		Mayhew (note with below) they learned to read and write and are now married
Oklima	14		Oct 17, 1827		Mayhew, note with above.. they learned to read and write and are now married
Mary Hancock	6		Oct 17, 1827 left July 1, 1828	9	Mayhew, was taken from school by father, read in test.
Winne Wilson	6		Oct 17, 1827		Mayhew
Polly Beams	6		Oct 17, 1827		Mayhew
Margaret Campbell	5		Feb 12, 1828		Mayhew

The ages of each scholar was given as it appeared to be at time of entrance.

56 have been members of the school since it's commencement May 1822 until the close of term July (cutoff). Seven new members admitted this term.

32 were ignorant of the English language

13 learned to read English well

15 read tolerably well in the testament

15 read Chatha and English

16 wrote composition

15 others commenced writing

17 studied Geo.

11 were married. 3 deaths

a number of them also worked decently in mens clothes and most of them sewed with _ also knits.

Average no.

six members of the mission family not included.

Next table has no dates

Name	Notes
? A. Dukes	Reads Chakta and English, has some knowledge of geography, and writes letters
Julia Teasy	Could read both languages and write a little, she professes religion
Alzira Beams	Could read in testament
Gincy Beams	Read in testament
Lucinda Victor	Could read the testment in both languages
Typhena Wall	Read in testament
Sally McIntosh	Reads in words of two syllables
Louisiana Folsom	Read words of two syllables
Charlotte Magee
Lavina Wall
Polly Wilson
Lydia Goodall
Betsy Thompson	These five little girls but just commenced an education
Elister May
Else Folsom
Selina Folsom
Mary Walton	These four girls read tolerably well in testament
Lucy James	Could read and write was amiable, was united with the church a little before she left Mayhew